Grilled Cheese and The Question

Note from the Author I wrote this in late March concerning a couple of people who have become very important to me.  I feel honored to have come to know them and witness their love and respect for each other.  Some time early this morning, May 8, 2013, the Mr. in this story passed away in his sleep.  A gentle passing for a gentle man and a blessing to us all.  BP

I was in the kitchen making lunch. Grilled cheese. They love my grilled cheese. It’s funny, too. They have the resources to have the best of the best. But they love my grilled cheese because it is just grilled cheese; good bread, butter and cheese. No fancy cheese, either but the mildest shredded cheddar cheese you can find. That’s it. Nothing fancy. That’s the kind of folks they are. Middle American money. They can afford a chef. They choose a neighbor who makes a simple grilled cheese. There it is; a lovely kind of thing, simple and honest and real. This is the life they live, for now, at least. I know when they were younger they travelled often and sometimes in their own plane. I have seen pictures of them both on camel back with crowns on their heads. But, even then, I suspect they preferred a good grilled cheese to gorgonzola and sprouts on gluten-free flat bread. It just seems to be who they are. Anyway, I was in the kitchen and I could hear them. They were bickering a bit. It often sounds worse than it is because neither can hear worth a darn. Mr. was talking about buying a car. Mr. can’t drive anymore but that is not a concern to him. Mr. has always had a car and doesn’t have one now so …he needs a car. When Mrs. was in the hospital it was a common topic. We talked a lot about which make and model would be a good fit. It was as a safe topic and because he doesn’t drive, nothing would come of it. But, Mrs. is home now and for some reason when Mr. talks of getting a car it aggravates her. Mrs. told him in no uncertain terms he was not getting a car. Mr. was curious as to why not. Because of the universal inability to hear, this calm conversation is being shouted across the great distance of about three and a half feet. Both Mr. and Mrs. are settled deeply in the envelopes they call chairs. Over time these chairs, which once could have politely been referred to as overstuffed, have given way to the irresistible force that are Mr. and Mrs. The chairs are now as completely formed to the body of the users that they might have been created by an artisan of unmatched skill. And, in a way, they have. For enumerable hours, each chair has held its occupant as they watched the world evolve through their grand picture windows. The chairs, planted in the same spots on the carpet, she on the right and he on her left, closer to both her heart and the front door, allow both proximity and distance. Only three and a little feet apart, the chairs face not each other but the same window. They face the world as a brace of shotguns; working together to see what there is to see and keep the homestead safe. And, over the hours, days, months and years those chairs have adjusted to their task and allowed themselves to cradle Mr. and Mrs. like a babe in her mother’s arms. Those chairs are so desperately in need of cleaning and repair I suffer a bit each time I look at them. Those chairs are so completely theirs that the thought of replacing them makes me want to cry. Mrs. reminds Mr. with an insistent tone that he doesn’t have a driver’s license. No license means no driving and no driving means no car. Mr. says, “Fine. I’ll go get a license.” The argument is familiar. He sees no reason why he shouldn’t do what he has always done. She knows that time has settled around them as they have settled into those chairs. And, the time for new cars and drives in the country has eroded away. Mr. still feels the need to be up and out and in charge. Still, instead of arguing the point he settles a little further into his chair as Mrs. states, “You can’t get a license anymore.” He bristles a bit at the remark and in his lined face and watery eyes you can see the outline of the lion he once was. Age and time have taken much but what it takes it burns in stone as immutable history. Once, not all that long ago, Mr. was a force of nature creating, driving and making both things and futures. And, while the memories fade the attitude survives. He seems for a moment to choose to stand his ground and rage a little. Then he sees, again, who he is talking to and he softens. His face now without guile or artifice, like a child’s, he asks, “Why can’t I have a license?” Now her face, a moment ago shining with the energy of aggravation with Mr., radiates with a different energy. She exudes anger at the world but this time in defense of the lion that once was only tamed by her. I don’t know what exactly she sees when she first looks at Mr. I know when I look at my wife of nearly thirty years I often see the beautiful young woman I dated and pursued. I reckon Mrs. sees not the man of nearly ninety but the man she agreed to marry some sixty-five years ago. I think it was the unfairness of a world that respects no privacy that caused the spark in her eye. I think it was in defense of the man who loved and loves her that put the harsh tone in her voice when she said, “Because of the internet. They know what you have!” I have been watching and listening from the kitchen. It is not the first time I have heard this conversation. But normally it is a conversation that wanders off topic before now. I think I know what is coming. I stand over my “Cuisinart Griddler” where my exceptionally simple grilled cheese is toasting and melting just as it should. I wonder if I should stick my nose in and see if I can change the subject. Maybe I can ask about the house that Mr. and I sometimes talk about that he always wanted to build on the flat ground in the back of the property. Or, maybe I could ask about one of the kids or the bevy of grand-kids. Maybe I could throw in an anecdote about my son or my daughters. But, in my indecision I have squandered my chance. Choosing what to say has also cost me the moment and now there is nothing I can do. Because now in a much more quiet, much more open, much less certain voice comes the question. “What do I have?” he asks. There it is; the ironic, maddening, aggravating, heart-rending question. “What do I have?” Mrs. looks Mr. in the face and now the whole world softens. The air in the room moves with a gentle caress as if to carry the caress in her voice across the three and a half-foot chasm for her. I am blessed to witness the steel in her that gives her the courage to tell the terrible truth, again, in a way that delivers a punch like a kiss. Mrs. says, “You have Alzheimer’s.”, with a softness that resonates to my soul. Mr. looks back with no anger at all. He does say, “I love you.” in a way that I will carry with me to my grave. He tells her he loves her in a way I hope I can someday, somehow, someway convey to my wife and children. Mr. looks at Mrs. with a face as pure as the face a father shows his newborn child and says, “But you’re OK aren’t you?” Mrs. just looks on and wordlessly nods. He smiles and nods, and, then goes back to reading the words on the page of the paper. Words that are familiar but whose meanings elude him more and more each day. But, it doesn’t matter to him because she is OK. It is time to serve the grilled cheese.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Reality First.

I have a daughter who is physically handicapped.  She suffered a stroke before she was born.  She is bright as a penny and smarter than you and wants all of the things that neuro-typical children want.  She is approaching the magic age, in Ohio, of fifteen and a half where she might be able to obtain a learners permit.  She wants to be like every other girl her age.  The problem, of course, is that she isn’t.  She and I have discussion after discussion that always ends with the same caution; We will accept reality before we put others at risk.  I asked her once how she would feel if she hurt or killed someone because we let her drive even though her reaction times were not adequate to the task.  Would that be worth getting to drive?  She never hesitates in answering with a firm , “No.”  You see she gets that reality trumps wishful thinking.  Our politicians don’t.

Take into consideration the horrifying events of the Sandy Hook elementary school murders.  A mentally unstable man stole guns and in an act driven by irrationality he entered an elementary school armed to the teeth and committed heinous acts of evil and cowardice.  And, now, our national politicians are arguing over gun control issues?  I won’t go into the folly of the vast majority of these arguments but I do wonder when we will deal with reality.  You see they are talking about the wishful thinking of controlling men through the tools they have at their disposal.  As if man hasn’t progressed as far as we have based entirely on the creating of tools for the job at hand.  Every single day there are new tools invented because someone wants to build or break something and an adequate tool doesn’t currently exist.  If anyone honestly believes man cannot come up with a new tool to do his killing if guns are taken away has never even for a moment considered the history of man.

And, more to the point, what is the reality of the situation?  Guns exist in numbers far too large to ever account for.  And the technology to make guns or bombs or gas cylinders is readily available and easily duplicated in, say, my neighbors garage where he machines parts for motorcycles.

There is a reality here that seems to be ignored far too often.  The laws are what the laws are at least for the time being.  Guns are available and there is no short term solution for the “nanny-staters” to get them out of the hands of law abiding citizens, much less law breakers and crazies.  Given this fact, the schools that do not have armed protectors, the best solution currently available, protecting our children are criminally negligent.  The liberal politicians and those who have kowtowed to politically correct thinking in regards to “gun free zones” have been complicit in leaving our children in harms way.  We hear repeatedly from the Piers Morgan’s and President Obama’s of the world that there is ample evidence these crimes will be committed.  If there is evidence of a clear and present danger and the only adequate current solution is to provide some form of armed protection then why hasn’t it been done?  Could it really be that the political agenda of the anti-gun lobby is more important than protecting the children of Sandy Hook…or Columbine…or the local middle school in your town?

I would ask the school boards of America’s schools whether it is worth the murder of innocents to continue to promote an anti-gun message in the face of the truth that wishful thinking is no protection against the reality of an armed intruder?

The children of Sandy Hook were murdered by a crazed man.  The killing field was provided by liberal politicians paving the way with their good intentions.

Posted in DashBoard Monologues | Leave a comment

We have seen the problem and…

When friends or family complain about something I often joke, “It could be worse.  It could be me.”  After the “fiscal cliff” fiasco of the last week it is painfully apparent, it is me.  And, you.  It is all of us who find ourselves the recipients of the most incompetent governance possible.  Our elected officials are grown men and women pretending they have a clue about how to solve the problems of America from Washington when the problems of America lie where they have always; in the front room of the American family.  In the last week I have sat in my front room with my daughters and watched TV shows based 100% around unmarried, immature, overwrought men and women bedding each other like rabbits without a moment’s hesitation.  I am ashamed of myself for allowing such filth into my home and worse inviting it into the lives of my daughters. Outside of the embarrassing failures of our representatives in government the most reported story of the weekend was the announcement of the pregnancy of Kim Kardashian.  Trumpeted all over the internet is the news that a woman who is mostly famous for screwing on video and selling it on the internet, marrying a basketball player and leaving him after less than three months has gotten pregnant by one man while still legally married to the other.  Sandra Flukes’ got nothing on this chick.  The out-of-wedlock birth rate is shockingly high when every statistic screams how children of unmarried parents not named West or Kardashian are practically doomed to a life of poverty and crime. We suffer over gay marriage when marriage as an institution is under attack on nearly every societal front.  We poke fun at Tim Tebow because he is rich, virtuous and proudly Christian when just a few years ago he would have represented the ideal of the young single American man. We promote promiscuity as if it were a positive model of behavior when medical science informs us it is a guarantee of disease, neurosis and heartache.  We parade sitcom after sitcom past the eyes and minds of our children where the married Mom and Dad are the clown princes and princesses of society and Charlie Sheen gets more famous for humiliating his wife, children, coworkers and faith while living with porn stars and is rewarded with a new sitcom built entirely around him. We pay people more money to stay on unemployment than any legitimate business could ever afford to pay entry-level employees and wonder why we have so many long-term unemployed.  We act like we have policy answers to ethical crises.  We don’t.  What makes that truth so aggravating is that we all know the answers to the problems.  We know.  We know that keeping score in games teaches the losers how much better they need to be and how hard being good really is.  We know that reasonably disciplining our children teaches right from wrong.  We know that shunning immoral behavior in the public square teaches people not to commit immoral acts.  We know that insisting our young men treat our young women with respect and gentleness creates a society where women can thrive. We know that teaching our daughters to live chaste until marriage insures the future of our grand-children and promotes marriages that are stable and loving.  We know that young men who get young women pregnant and don’t marry them and pay for the rearing of their children belong in prison for they have violated the most fundamental contract between parent and child. We know that women who cannot raise their children because they have not married the father and have no families to support them should find for those children a stable home to adopt, care for and love them.  We have stigmatized the mother who gave up her children for adoption because of the shame of her circumstance to the detriment of the millions raised in poverty so we could feel good. We know that rates of recidivism mean our children are not safe when murderers, child molesters and rapists are allowed to breathe free air yet we pretend there are cures for pure evil. We know that murder is wrong and that life begins at conception, (proven by science decades ago), yet we conspire to allow the murder of the innocent unborn everyday to absolve the parents of their crimes. We know we are more highly evolved than animals yet we fund groups like PETA who scream at us that we are no better than animals. And, then, we take license to behave like animals. We know that education in civics and philosophy, math and science, reading and history is the route to prosperity yet we teach our children politically correct summaries that fail to teach anything of use. We know that the ignorant are helpless and the helpless are hopeless and we allow our politicians to prey on that hopelessness to control us and create generations of hopeless children. We know.  And, we know that if we want to solve the problems of America we must first address the real problem; Americans.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Fundamentals

The theme of the upcoming election will center on the economy because, as hard as Mr. Obama will work to talk about something else, it is the elephant in the room.  The Obama campaign has an ad ready to run supporting the use of President Clinton as keynote at the DNC where he complains that deregulation was the cause of the current economic woes.  The facts could not be more to the contrary.  It seems as if many politicians regardless of affiliation are unwilling to take on the failures caused by hyper regulation of the banking industry.  Some claim it is just too wonk-ish for the average voter to get.  I accept that this is true to a certain extent but only to the extent that the voters who are too stupid to get it are already going to vote for Mr. Obama.  Those on the fence and needing motivation are in a place where learning the facts is a game changer.  Now is the time to trumpet the fundamentals and morality of free markets.  I am suspicious that too many of our politicians are loath to describe the nightmare that the Community Reinvestment Acts, Dodd-Frank and more have been because they do not want to back themselves in the corner where they find it hard to commit the same atrocities on the American public. Nonetheless, it seems beyond them to fight this fight and the economists I see on the TV are ill-equipped as well.  In an effort to prove to everybody how smart they are they seem incapable of delivering a decipherable message to the great unwashed.  The question is why is it better to get the boot of regulation off of the financial industry?  Here is why.

I am not an economist.  I consider this a good thing.  I note in the papers that there is hardly a month that goes by where the governmental reports on nearly any segment of the economy were unexpected by economists.  I am a business man.  I have owned and operated my own businesses for over 25 years and I am an aggressive proponent of free markets not because I can go out and do whatever I want. Rather free markets allow me to do what every successful business person has done since the beginning of time: Learn from other people’s mistakes.  When markets are unregulated, small business persons go out into the market and try to create a business. Now, no matter how much effort an entrepreneur puts into planning his business start-up, there is a moment where risk is taken, the loan papers are signed and the doors are opened.  The economist might refer to the economic activity created as a lab exercise.  In this I agree. Each time a business is opened or a risk taken an experiment is underway.  Each and every experiment in entrepreneurship provides data back to the market about what is successful and when.  And, each of these experiments succeeds in supporting the hypothesis or not but something is learned every time.  When the market is free of regulation the experiments are done by small businesses with little or no initial economic impact taken individually.  If I have myriad options and choose to open a coffee shop and it fails, there is a tragedy at my house but really only at my house. If markets are regulated and I have few options and I and all the other start-ups are limited to opening very similar coffee shops and we all fail the economic impact is not individual but collective and the impact is great.  This was the avalanche caused by the Community Reinvestment Act.  A purchase of a house is a business transaction.  I bought a house not just to have a place to live but also as an investment to help with my retirement.  Toward that end, I maintain the home, improve the property, pester my neighbors to do the same so that when it comes time to sell, I will have bought low and sold high.  I am not unique in this way.  Nearly every home owner does that.  And, when the market for the money to buy that house is unregulated the experiment in real estate I undertake succeeds or fails and affects mostly just me.  When the government tells the banking/mortgage industry to let everyone regardless of qualification take part in this experiment, when the failures happen the effect is collective and huge.  The housing bubble was the lead domino in the economic collapse and the reason it had such impact was because of regulation, not the lack of it.  Getting the government out of markets to the greatest degree possible allows for greater and more diverse experimentation in the economic lab.  And, the information flows freely when the financial industry is free to participate.  If you have ever been in a meeting with an investment banker or a venture capitalist you learn volumes by listening to them describe what they have seen succeed or fail.  Business men who are successful are more than willing to share why and failures are trumpeted in every way possible because success breeds success and failure drags on us all.  The learning from micro-economic experiments in capitalism has a macro-economic impact to the good. But, when the government enters markets it creates pathways to entrepreneurship that collect the impact and when failures occur they are massive.  Now this is not rocket science.  So, why do governments insist on regulation so often?  Because of two reasons that are really mutually exclusive and tragic when applied simultaneously: compassion and arrogance.  Collectivists like Mr.’s Obama, Clinton, and Carter seek to remove the risk from starting a business and they presume to know better in all cases as to how to go about it.  The compassion is misplaced and the arrogance is unearned.  It takes the economic laboratory of free markets to filter out all of the impurities inevitable in even the most well thought out business plan.  There has never been a central planner that always got it right and the impact of a centrally planned failure is definitionally catastrophic.  The compassionate goal of limiting risk is both foolish and misplaced.  In short, risk cannot be avoided only shared.  Allowing me to fail and others to succeed based on the merits of our business acumen allows for far more success across the economy. My failure informs the experiment of many and those successes lead to jobs; maybe for me. It is fundamental that free markets react more quickly and with greater accuracy than centrally planned government regulated markets.  Bureaucracies creep and markets fly and in an era of Internets and wireless connectivity, the secrets of success and the pitfalls of failure are available to any who is willing to listen.  It is so fundamental it is impossible to trust a politician who is not willing to espouse the value and morality of free markets.  It is so fundamental that you can be certain that if your candidate is espousing greater regulation and shared risks, your candidate does not have a clue as to what to do to solve our economic problems.  That too is fundamental.

Posted in DashBoard Monologues | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Speech

The Speech
Recently I was given one of the most precious gifts of my life. It came to me in the form of a wedding invitation. You see, years ago I was blessed to coach a little baseball. I got to spend what I hoped was quality time with my son and his classmates learning and playing the game of baseball. I was further blessed by the parents of my son’s classmates to be allowed to spend time coaching their kids. I had a blast. We played ball, and learned the game and I watched them grow from t-ballers to varsity baseball players and some even college ball players. I got to see them struggle with the ravages of teenage angst and grow to become young men who I am proud to call friends and family. I have been further blessed to call some of their parents my best of friends. Men with whom I coached and families of children I was allowed to coach. One of those young men was married last week and honored me with an invitation to the festivities. I was thrilled to attend. And, as if that were not gift enough more than a handful of the young men I coached were in attendance. The father of the groom made a point of gathering them all up in a corner of the reception hall to get a picture. I can’t wait to see it. These little boys who helped me in so many ways become a better parent and man stood behind me, towering over me, with the same stupid grins they had when they were 10 years old. But then it got even better. At least for me. You see, I started every season of baseball with a speech. As far as speeches go it really isn’t much. It is short and sweet and hopefully to the point. It hasn’t changed more than a word or two in the 15 years since I started giving it and it lasts no time at all. But, to my delight, the boys wanted to hear it again. My great friend and fellow coach wanted to hear it again. He even dug up a baseball to use as the needed prop. So, in a corner of the reception hall hidden away from the dance floor I stood before my boys and one more time gave the speech. They spoke along with me, word for word as I started. They grinned and laughed as the familiar words tumbled out of me more a prayer than instruction. They tolerated the tears in my eyes as I looked into theirs seeing men I am so proud to know. They hugged me when I finished and treated me as if I were an important part of their growing up. They made me feel like I had given to them something when I know without a doubt in my mind; I got so much more from them than they could have ever gotten from me. Oh, and they listened as I finished the speech with words they had never heard me say but were always a part of the speech in my heart. I hope they know what a wonderful gift they gave me. I hope they know what joy their letting me play a part in their childhood was for me. I pray that they get the same joy in their lives of coaching their son’s and joining in the celebrations of their lives. I pray they get in their lives the same gift they have given me.
This then, is the speech:

(Take a baseball in hand, hold it up and say:)

Boys, this is a baseball.
The team that controls the ball will win the game.
We will control the ball with our hands, our gloves our bats and our brains.
We will control the ball with our hands by throwing it where it needs to go.
We will control the ball with our gloves by catching it and fielding it.
We will control the ball with our bats by learning to hit it and putting the ball in play.
We will control the ball with our brains by knowing the situation and what to do with the ball.
Boys, this is a baseball.
(And now the part they had never heard…)
But as we get older the game changes.
Now it is no longer a baseball
It is Love.
The team that honors Love will win the game.
We honor Love with our hands, our hearts and our brains.
We honor Love with our hands by treating those we love gently and holding them close.
We honor Love with our hearts by giving it to those we love.
We honor Love with our brains by learning to give those we love what they need.
You see boys; this was never just a baseball.
I thank God every day for those boys, their families and my son. Every single day.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

“Cool” counts for ….Nothing.

The race is on and the primary complaint about the presumptive Republican candidate is that he is a wildly successful business man.  He has been described as stiff and not particularly charismatic and rich and un-cool.  All of which are descriptions I personally think are fairly accurate.  And, mostly, appellations I hope someday can be applied to me.  And, furthermore, I wish every time Mr. Obama’s minions attempts to denigrate Mr. Romney as an out of touch rich guy, he should grin and nod along.  He should take every opportunity to remind folks that he took the strong start given him by his father’s success and multiplied it through the use of his intellect and work ethic.  He should remind everyone every day that his goal has never been to be “cool”.  He should remind everyone that hard work is what pays for “cool”.  That intelligence understands “cool” to be an entertainment value but not a core value.  He should remind everyone that he is not running for Class President but President of the United States and “cool” is not part of the qualifications for the job.  Intelligence is.  Acumen is.  Ability to manage and make a hard decision is.  “Cool” is for getting dates and being popular on the playground.  We have a “cool” President who maintains his “cool” by doing anything and everything to look “cool”.  Mostly, for this President, that means failing to make hard decisions and face problems head on.  How many times does this President have to kick the can down the road for people to understand that even he knows he is out of his depth?  Mr. Romney needs to show a little of the arrogance that makes a man a man.  When he is called rich, he needs to say, “No, son.  I am not rich.  I am really rich. And I know how to help you get rich, too.”  When he is faced with the claim he is out of touch he needs to say, “Out of touch?  Nobody who makes the kind of money I make is out of touch.  I make the kind of money I make by knowing what the public wants to buy and what the public needs.  The fact you don’t understand that is why you need me as President.”  In short he needs to brag about his success because it is brag-able.  And, it is a marked difference between his history and that of the current occupant.  He has been there and done that.  Mr. Obama has read about it, seen the film strip and called it racist.  It is time for a candidate like Mr. Romney to stand up and take control of the process.  He needs to shout from the mountaintops that he is applying for a job of work not a part in a movie.  “Cool” does not count.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Apologies

I have been overwhelmed by certain changes in my work life and other involvements. Nothing drastic, just busier than I can manage. I have much written but not edited so I will begin to post in bunches soon. I don’t presume it really matters to anyone but the ether but I thought if there were accidental views i should apologize for the weak effort.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment